If you say something often enough, loud enough, and with enough confidence, people tend to believe you. This is what has happened with the theory of evolution. Though a “theory,” Darwinism is presented as absolute fact, both in public schools, college universities and TV programming. I remind the reader that a “theory” is something that has not yet been proven. It is a supposition.
For 100 years, geneticists have believed that the fruit fly might provide the evolutionary evidence that has been lacking. These flies were selected for their short generation times and for having only four pairs of chromosomes. However, according to a recent study, after 100 years of research, in laboratories all over the world, scientists have concluded that the fruit flies are the same as they were 100 years ago. Their DNA is unchanged. This was the result, even after the fruit flies were “subjected to all manner of mutation-inducing phenomena, including hosts of chemicals and radiation treatments, to try and accelerate evolution-mimicking mutations.”
Those of us who affirm the creation model of origins [Genesis 1] are accused of being “fools” for believing in an unprovable model of origins, yet the evolutionist also has his unprovable model. Is he also a “fool?” Or is he just a hypocrite for calling Bible-believers fools? We are told that, “the fool has said in his heart, ‘there is no God’” (Psalm 14:1; 53:1). The design and orderly arrangement of the universe do imply the existence of an intelligent designer (Psalm 19:1, 2; Romans 1:20; Acts 14:17).
Tim Haile